5 common home insurance myths

5 common home insurance myths

You may have heard that it costs less to insure an older home than a new home. But it’s not necessarily true – and that’s one of the common myths about homeowners insurance highlighted in this article from Bankrate.

It may not be required by law, like auto or health insurance, but you’ll need home insurance to protect your family and household from a financial disaster in case another kind of disaster strikes.

As with other types of insurance, there are common misconceptions about the coverage you’re buying when you pony up a premium year after year, such as believing your policy protects your home against every possible thing that could happen. In a couple of (very familiar) examples, most home insurance won’t cover earthquakes or floods.

“People tend to think of (insurance) in black and white, like, ‘If I have insurance, I’m insured. If I don’t, I’m not,'” says Amy Bach, executive director of United Policyholders, an insurance consumer group in San Francisco. “But there’s actually a lot more gray in home insurance coverage than people realize.”

For example, it’s wrong to assume that insurance premiums are cheaper for homes that have more years on them.

“Older homes tend to have … construction techniques that tend to be more expensive to replace than what you see in modern-day construction,” says Christopher Hackett, director of personal lines policy for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America in Chicago.

You might see crown molding, hardwood floors, plaster and stained glass in an older home, compared with drywall and wood veneer floors in a newer residence, he adds.

Some insurance companies may refuse to cover an older home if it seems too costly to repair, Bach warns.

When determining what it will cost to fix or replace your home, an insurer will evaluate several factors, including the features of your home and the materials used to build it.

“It’s always good for a consumer to get at least a few quotes from a few different companies to make sure that they accept a competitive premium to insure their property,” Hackett says.

If you think you’re doing your wallet a favor by basing your coverage on the current market value of your house, think again.

You should instead insure your home for what it would cost to rebuild and replace it, advises David Marlett, chair of the department of finance, banking and insurance at Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina. That’s particularly important if you live in a hot market where prices are rising quickly.

“If you insured for the market value, you would be purchasing more insurance than needed to pay for the replacement of your home and wasting premium dollars,” he says.

If you live in a not-so-hot market, choosing replacement cost over market value coverage also makes sense. “If you live in an area with a depressed market value, it could cost far more to actually rebuild your home than what your home is worth if you tried to sell.”

Your insurance company can help you calculate what it would likely cost to replace your home in the event of a total loss.

Also, your policy also may not cover every one of your possessions. This falls under the myth of: “I’ve got insurance, therefore everything I have is covered,” Bach says. “There are a lot of ways in which that’s not true.”

Insurers place limits on coverage for certain possessions, such as jewelry and rare collections. You would likely need to purchase additional insurance in the form of an endorsement, also called an “add-on,” for those items.

“Most insurers will offer an optional endorsement so you can insure … whatever valuable personal property that you may have for its full value, should it be stolen or lost in a fire or anything like that,” Hackett says.

[Read the full article]

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin